top of page
Search
Writer's picturejanet g

When Crime Doesn’t Pay

With art easier than ever to fake – and questionable on whether it’s as easy to pass off as authentic – an update of my three-part series on infamous art forgers: Part 1.


thecuriousg, when crime doesn't pay, part 1 of 3, art forgery, infamous forgers, de hory, van meegeren, keating

Part 1 of a three-part series on art forgers and fakes. Read part 2.

 

Like a great heist, art forgeries make for exciting stories – for readers, like me. For acquirers, of course – not so thrilling.


Duped!


“…unfortunately, forgery is a huge part of the art world,” said Julia Courtey, curator of the D’Amour museum in Springfield, MA. “It’s estimated that up to 40 percent of the artwork [in museums and private collections] consists of forgeries.”


From important museums such as the Art Institute of Chicago, New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art and London’s National Gallery to uber galleries including Sotheby’s and Christie’s, major players have repeatedly determined that the provenance of some fakes was true and authenticated it. That’s how great the need is for one-upmanship – to unearth an unknown gem in the art world. But in 20 years, another art expert could come along and un-authenticate the work based on new information. It’s as simple and complex as that.


Sotheby's Institute of Art alumna, Laura Patten states in her thesis, Painting Red Flags: A Typology of Art Fraud and Risk Indicators, that 87% of art authenticity frauds investigated by the FBI over the last 30 years were perpetuated by art world insiders. Perhaps unsurprising.


The Great Fakes


Thanks to some of the following great forgers – many of whom were themselves artists, art restorers or art dealers – working the inside track to make money became easy. Like most successful art forgers, they painted original works “in the masters’ styles,” which made the forgeries much harder to detect. The forgeries were often authenticated as unknown or lost masterpieces, and were quite a coup for the museums or galleries.


While these three artists produced many forgeries and permanently altered the art world, each was looking for more than money. In the end, they either confessed or lived out their lives on the run.


1 : Elmyr de Hory: Hungarian artist – forger looking for an occupation


Elmyr de Hory lived a colorful and sketchy life. Most of his early history was reported via novelist Clifford Irving, himself a convicted fraud. de Hory studied painting in Germany and Paris, and spent time in and out of jail for many years, though not for forgery. From the 1940s through the 1960s, he made hundreds of forgeries and duped collectors with his replicas of Picasso, Modigliani and Renoir.


By the late 1950s, suspicions were being raised, and by the early ‘60s, the forgeries were being traced to him. Living in Ibiza and staying one step ahead of the law, he was never directly charged with forgery. A Spanish court could not prove that de Hory had ever created any forgeries on Spanish soil, so he was expelled in 1968.


de Hory suffered from mental illness most of his life. He made little money from the forgeries or from his legit art. In 1976, he overdosed. Following his suicide, his paintings became very valuable.


2 : Han van Meegeren: Dutch portraitist – convicted forger seeking payback


Determined to be an artist, Han van Meegeren’s personal work was called “derivative” by art critics. That didn’t sit well with Han, so he decided to show his critics talent of a different kind: Forging work in the Dutch Golden Age style – including artists Frans Hals, Pieter de Hooch and particularly Johannes Vermeer.


van Meegeren spent six years perfecting his 1936 Vermeer-like Supper at Emmaus which was authenticated and sold at a high price. With the outbreak of WWII while living in Amsterdam, he continued refining his forging style, and produced many pieces. But in 1942, in ill health under the German occupation, one of van Meegeren’s pieces – a Vermeer of declining quality – was purchased by Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring.


The painting was eventually traced back to van Meegeren. But even with an ingenious story defending himself against a collaboration charge, he confessed and was convicted of forgery and fraud. While awaiting imprisonment, he had a massive heart attack and died in 1947. He had previously filed for bankruptcy and his estate was sold off. His ex-wife (divorced for a tax haven) was assumed to be worth millions.


3 : Tom Keating: British art restorer – arrested forger upending the system


Tom Keating was a purist. Even in his revolt against a greedy system, his nearly 2,000 fakes covering nearly 100 artists including many of the Impressionists, were painstakingly realized. He worked in acrylics, watercolors and oils, and spent hours making pigments and canvas preparations.


Keating’s laborious methods served another purpose: To intentionally fool the experts and dupe the system. Born into a poor London family, and pushed aside as an artist in his own right, Keating believed the system was exploitative and greedy, and deliberately set out to upend it. He went to great lengths to generate misleading provenances for his paintings, and added flaws and messages to under layers or used materials peculiar to the period purposely.


When an overabundance of similar Samuel Palmer paintings appeared in 1977, Keating was finally arrested and accused of conspiracy to defraud. Because his health was bad, the case was dropped. He died in 1984, after achieving minor celebrity with a how-to-paint TV show. Christie’s auctioned over 200 of his works. The amount raised was said to have been considerable – even for his known forgeries.


Many in the art world believe that the 40% forgery stat is a conservative estimate. Sotheby’s forensic scientist and artist James Martin ballparks higher, “probably 98 percent are fake.”

Being an art expert today is risky and many authentication boards have shut down. A lot of experts no longer provide opinions. Legally, it could be career suicide to do so. Or worse, many experts have received death threats.


Technology has come to the rescue in art authentication through Mr. Martin’s lab at Sotheby’s. Discounted legal advice may be available through the non-profit group, International Catalogue Raisonné Association at the Royal Academy of Arts in London. In the US, many states have changed laws to protect authenticators from litigation.


Some questions occurred to me: Where does original art end and the restoration begin? When Michelangelo’s dingy and cracked Sistine Chapel was lovingly restored in the mid 90s, is it still a Michelangelo, or is it now a high-profile fake? How much and how vast, does the restoration have to be before the original artist’s work is no longer represented? Questions to ponder.


Or, accept the forgeries as art and head to Vienna to visit the Museum of Art Fakes.

 

Part 1 of a three-part series on art forgers and fakes. Read part 2.



Montage design: © 2020 Janet Giampietro | Elmyr de Hory’s Portrait of a Woman in the style of Modigliani; Han van Meegern’s Supper at Emmaus in the style of Vermeer; Tom Keating’s forgery of Renoir’s Dance at Bougival.

124 views

Related Posts

See All

Yorumlar


bottom of page